Sign up | Miro | Online Whiteboard for Visual Collaboration

Voters wanted flat, minimal hierarchical, structure and strongly supported collective decision making.

As part of collective decision making, I wonder what voters would feel about a delegated voting setup. I personally like the idea of “I don’t want to have to make this choice, but I trust so-and-so to do it for me” being once of the choices I can make. The issue there is developing a way that deters gaming and manipulation. Slashing, staking, etc, can provide the foundation for rules, but there has to be something in place to prevent incentivized governance takeover.

If I want an outsized portion of the vote, I could incentivize other governance token holders to delegate their vote weight to me, in exchange, for say, a certain amount of yield for the duration of time they allow me to vote with their vote weight. This market is likely to pop up organically, so we either have to build the game to accommodate it or to use expected behaviors to drive positive sum outcomes for all parties.

DAO Council ← it should be our responsibility to launch this election on our way out

• Total of 13 members
  • 7 multisig signers
  • 6 community stewards
    • Should these Stewards be selected for particular strengths?
    • How are they chosen?
    • How are they replaced?
• Makes funding decisions
  • Approves or rejects grant requests
  • Approves or rejects operational expense packages
• Provides a roadmap or timeline for the organization
  • Current operations, seasonally or annually
• Dispute resolution
  • Arbitration via Council vote
  • Includes a veto power or path for community-wide voting
• Weekly public meetings

Guilds

• Instead of subgroups, these would be tags or badges or credentialling of some sort
  • Create an active badge that expires and self-destructs
  • Create a “resume-style” badge that proves your historical participation, on chain
• Stake X amount of Contributor Token to join a guild
  • More guilds, more staking
  • Disincentivizes being in every guild simultaneously
  • Incentivizes specialization
• Never funded
• Are not expected to produce anything
  • Merely an association of members
  • Who may collaborate with each other or not
  • But the directory of skilled friends should be there
• Based on skill sets; open to all
  • Writers
  • Design
  • A/V
  • Marketing
  • Translators
• Guild roles would be voluntary and honorary
• Guild roles would not be compensated

Operations (Dept? Group? Hub?)

• Would look like a streamlined version of the old Ops Dept
  • Infrastructure management and maintenance
  • Infosec and community security
  • Tokenomics and treasury management
• Appointed individuals to start, likely sourced from existing role holders
• With room to create workstreams for specific tasks later, if scaling
• Roles would be compensated based on some set of criteria, to be determined

Content Workstreams

• Workstreams may be created or deprecated through which mechanisms or procedures?
• We may have workstreams that launch with the reboot on day one
• What does a workstream look like?
  • Written Content
  • Audio Content
  • Social Media
  • Community Call
  • Translation
  • Memetics
  • Events
• Do they generate revenue?
  • Content creation could generate revenue
  • Revenue generated would be split x% to the org’s treasury and y% to content creators
• Are they compensated? How?
  • How in terms of rate? Hourly?
  • How in terms of method? Coodinape? Parcel Payroll?